Mar 28, Offensive and Defensive Combat. Reconnaissance, Security Operations, and Enemy Preparatory Fires. FM supersedes FM , Infantry Rifle Platoon and Squad, dated The primary audiences for this manual are Infantry rifle platoon leaders, platoon sergeants, and squad and fire. A platoon is a military unit typically composed of two or more squads/sections/ patrols. Platoon A platoon leader or commander is the officer in command of a platoon. One rifle per fireteam has an attached 40mm grenade launcher; one of the Specialist platoons, like reconnaissance, or "recce" platoons, that may be. Mar 28, SECTION I – FUNDAMENTALS OF INFANTRY PLATOON AND SQUAD Offensive and Defensive Combat. Platoon Sergeant. leader platoon sergeant, and squad and fire team leaders; instructors in. TRADOC Tactics. 1. The EMPLOYMENT of units in combat. 2. The ordered .. tions include movements to contact, attacks, raids, reconnaissance and. Offensive and Defensive Combat. Reconnaissance, Security Operations, and Enemy Preparatory Fires. FM supersedes FM , Infantry Rifle Platoon and Squad, dated The primary audiences for this manual are Infantry rifle platoon leaders, platoon sergeants, and squad and fire.
Mann mast magan 2 states mp3
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page. Back to the Modern Discussion to Message Board. Over on The Small Wars Council, a forum dedicated to modern warfare, there's frequent and often heated!
Some of the points of this debate on SWC include the size and even existance of squad level organization some argue for the elimination of 1 rifles recce platoon sergeantnumber and distribution of automatic weapons, type of round for basic small arms eg 5.
So what basic small arms would you provide? Something based on current 5. How large would your squads and fire team be or would you eliminate squads? Is a three 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant fire team big enough or, as some have argued, should you have no squads and five man teams?
Would you reintroduce a very light platoon level mortar as some have suggested or would you stick with heavy AT weapons? Would you keep heavier GPMGs at platoon level or standardize the entire platoon on one type of ammo?
For mech infantry, if tou had to choose, would it be wheeled or tracked? And how would you want troops distributed? More vehicles with fewer troops per vehicle or more, larger vehicles?
So your basic unit needs to be flexible, it needs to be scalable so it interlocks with others of the same level and higher level assets. So an 8 man building block that deploys as 2 4 man fireteams. At platoon you have 3 of these 8 man Rifle squads. There you have 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant in a bigger calibre, a heavier AT option and 81mm or similarish mortars and dedicated sniper team assets.
Make sure your IFV can carry 12 men fully laden, have good cross country performance, is mine and bomb proof and has anti infantry and anti softskin capability.
This methodology gives you a flexible, scalable and reasonably self sufficient set of building blocks. I'm going to play devil's advocate games pes 2014 ps2 torrent a moment and replu based on some comments I've read on SWC.
I can't take credit for the items below as they're based on ideas from SWC. Here goes. Rather than three squads of nine some have advocated for six teams of five so the smallest element is less likely to be effected by a single casualty or two.
However, some have argued for the return of the 50mm! This would limit turret size and potential armament. One would be 6. Both are still lighter than 7. This means teams of 4, maximum squad size of I think the US Army is doing this better, with a squad of 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant squad leader plus 2 fireteams. Possibly a turret similar to the Bradley, more likely just a RWS with a. Designed around the 9-man squad with a couple spare seats, probably with a 2-man crew in the track.
Track crewmen don't dismount, though. Have an armory where the squad can draw whatever weapons it deems are needed for the mission. All members of the squad are trained on all weapons. Larger IFV with tank killing cannon, don't care how big it needs to be, uparmored and has point defense.
I would even go so far as to 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant the IFV replace tanks merging mechanized infantry and tanks into one force.
Its not the round that makes 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant HMG its the tripod plus traversing and elevation mechanism. The Belgian 5. Properly deployed rifle grenades take the place of 50mm or 60mm mortars, are lkighter to carry and less of an issue. Hence a properly heavier Mortar at Platoon or Company, you need local supressive 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant fast.
A good squad leader will also do the, 2 LSWs here, rest with me etc tricks. Having everyone trained is good practise, but in the field you put the man who is good with something, rather the one who can just use it on that role. The basic building block would be 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant four man grouping.
Yes, they should have weapons. Weapons are good. All things being equal, Well trained capital "W" wellexperienced shooters with basic rifles will slaughter low grade troops armed with the very latest weapons.
Four rifles. May replace one rifle with a bipod automatic weapon and add grenade launcher s for high intensity combat where firepower is more important than mobility. Eight to ten soldiers total. Ten soldiers total. In low intensity operations, may be fielded as additional rifle groups. In low intensity operations, may be fielded as a additional rifle group. The Command Group of four. One attached Light Mortar group. Attached from the Company's Mortar Platoon when in the general advance.
Otherwise centralized at the Company level when on the defensive or during a deliberate attack. In low intensity operations, may be fielded as a additional rifle Platoon at the Company level. Maximum strength of 48 soldiers. Or more. Or less. All things being equal, the Platoon can take losses until it's Leader can no longer deploy a manoeuvre element supported by a firebase while retaining a reserve, say about 15 to 20 soldiers.
I was thinking in terms of deployment issues. I would rather deploy 5 vehicles that can transport infantry and kill tanks. The other option is 2007 champions league final youtube deploy 5 tanks and 5 APCs to get the same effect.
This is because 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant is the most psychologically stable group size, and because the NCO can do commandy-type things like making plans and attendng 'O' groups without stagging on, rather than 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant to do both and knackering himself. I would organise these basic groups into platoons of three maneouvre, one support and one command group. This gives something very like the experimental platoon that proved very effective in Jim Storr's "Sea Wall" exercises.
The platoon support group should include a 51mm mortar, FLY-K or something similar, as these have a hundred uses about the house and home.
The platoon's anti-tank capability would be based on LAWs of some kind, and against an armoured threat the UGL in the groups would probably be binned in favour of more LAWs. I would want a small-arms round somewhere between 5. The operational researchers for my fictional army would be tasked to study every possible option for reducing the weight carried by the infantryman. Batteries for Buck Rogers wonder-junk would be strongly discouraged, and body armour and hydration systems looked at with a very sceptical eye.
Emphasis should be put on vehicular support for load-carrying, perhaps using a low-profile mechanical mule, or caching packs at reserve element locations, rather than carrying everythign everywhere; and having enough blokes in the first place would be emphasised rather than trying to squeeze absurdly high levels of performance out of too few.
My tactical doctrine writers would make it clear that the group is in general not to be subdivided, and is the minimum amount of force to be used for, say, a listening post or recce patrol. Most tasks would doctrinally require at least a platoon. Infantry training would be extremely simple, with lots of practice rather than lots of theory.
Tactical formations such as arrowhead, echelon left and so on would simply not be taught; my infantry would go everywhere in single file, file, line, or, mostly, blob formation. The idea would be to be able to generate large and fairly competent forces quickly in a time of crisis. Yes, I'd probably have conscription. As used to be the case in the RN years ago, all personnel would be paid a bonus for demonstrating proficiency in any foreign language, tested annually, regardless of whether the language is required by current operations.
Don't the Israelis have a a version of the Merkava that carries a squad? At some point do AFVs become so vulnerable that super heavy tank armor becomes useless relative to ammo penetration? Is a tank gun round or ATGM can easily penetrate a tank or lighter vehicle why bother with the extra armor?
On the ground, unloaded, I think larger squads are generally better, especially in a high-threat environment, where you are likely to take casualties quickly. The 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant is true when they are traveling in the vehicle, since if hit, you are likely to take more casualties at once. In that case, smaller numbers of men in more vehicles is better. On the ground, I prefer a 12 man squad, made up of 3 x 4-man fireteams.
Each fire-team with one SAW. So, your platoon of 36 men, will either be in 3 or 4 vehicles, plus any HQ element personnel and their vehicle, for the unit, if desired. Assault Rifle 7. Not controllable. You need 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant lighter in a personal weapon.
I suppose you could follow John's idea of everyone has the 'SAW round,' but since the modern supply chain is capable of handling two different rounds in the squad, might as well optimize. When the Merk4s came online, the Israelis decided to 'recycle' the old Merk1s and 2s and possibly Merk3s into Namer APCs, and pulled the big-gun turret for a flat plate with dope body natural history one direction couple remote weapons stations.
One nuisance is that the 6. I would probably have to go to a single round for soldier-proofing. The 12 Marines we saw in the movie were half 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant platoon. Deploying a full platoon would have had another grunts plus another flight crew.
Mohammad armoush flooring Riflemen and Lance Corporals have been hand-picked from across the Battalion to undergo six weeks of specialist training to become experts in finding the enemy on the battlefield. Routinely, Recce Pl will find themselves forward of the front line, isolated from friendly forces, which requires a dedicated, professional and robust soldier.
Week 1 has been focused on providing the course with a foundation of knowledge which will help them perform their new role in the field. It has also been physically demanding, with intense physical training sessions requiring them to work together as a 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant and push through their perceived physical and mental barriers. Jump to. Sections of this page. Accessibility help. Email or Phone Password Forgotten account?
Sign Up. See more of The Rifles on Facebook. Log In. Forgotten account? Not Now. Pages liked by this Page. Steppe Eagle Exercise. Recent post by 1 rifles recce platoon sergeant. The Rifles.
It was a fantastic insight for the civil servants, giving them the opportunity to interact with the soldiers and equipment they manage. See more. Congratulations to all those selected today for promotion to WO2; C The Rifles added 10 new photos.